After realising I was getting more
and more confused about the general topic Sustainable development, last Sunday
we had our first session of Research for Sustainable development. Interestingly a contemporary issue arose that most of us would be familiar with, the over consumption of alcohol and violence in Kings Cross. For those who don't know Kings Cross, is a section of the city in Sydney full of night
clubs and famous for large congregations of young people (not under 18 off
course) having a good time and many of them with the aid of alcohol. However, just like in most social aspects of society,
there are always those few individuals that do not know their limits and
end up getting in trouble or even worse getting others in trouble.
After all the past incidents surrounding Kings Cross, including the death of a male teenager, Sydney
authorities are attempting to reduce the opening hours of Clubs, Pubs and Bottle
shops across Kings Cross in a attempt to curve the violence and social issues surrounding the area. A similar action has taken place in Newcastle, another
coastal city in NSW where the levels of violence involving young people related to
alcohol were the highest in the state. Numbers show that 37% of the incidents have
reduced but no one knows if the consumption of alcohol by teenagers has reduced
as well. The point I am trying to make here is simple, we are trying to learn
that education is the only way possible to empower individuals to change their behaviour
and attitudes towards a common goal, a better future.
Now what if we just start pressing charges against everyone that doesn't eat organic vegetables or doesn't drink certified coffee or even don’t have a hybrid car? Do we think that they will change their perceptions and mind set about their impacts on the environment? Or they are just going to pay a fine and keep the old cars and eating the same cheap vegetables? At the moment we are only fixing problems after the damage has been done. We are not trying to understand the causes of the problem. Why do we have so many teenagers at Kings Cross consuming alcohol until late? Or isn’t that maybe a problem where we should raise the age limit for alcohol consumption? We may see the numbers being reduced in that area but we don’t see the increase on house parties and the increase of violence within the other neighbourhoods. It seems to me that all we care about are the numbers, and not causes of the problems in the first place. I am learning new mind blowing concepts every day in class, I am reading more and more cases where through education communities, individuals and countries have changed their future. So why are the government and authorities are still trying to impose on how we should live our lives? Isn’t that common sense? Tilbury and Cooke (2005) say, “learning for sustainability does not rely on experts to determine how people should behave or how they should think, rather it promotes the learner’s active engagement in decision making and developing policy”, so as per the Kings Cross case, to learn how to not just fix the problems after the damage is done, we should take ownership of our decisions, commitment to the action chosen and be aware of the impact that we create.
Now what if we just start pressing charges against everyone that doesn't eat organic vegetables or doesn't drink certified coffee or even don’t have a hybrid car? Do we think that they will change their perceptions and mind set about their impacts on the environment? Or they are just going to pay a fine and keep the old cars and eating the same cheap vegetables? At the moment we are only fixing problems after the damage has been done. We are not trying to understand the causes of the problem. Why do we have so many teenagers at Kings Cross consuming alcohol until late? Or isn’t that maybe a problem where we should raise the age limit for alcohol consumption? We may see the numbers being reduced in that area but we don’t see the increase on house parties and the increase of violence within the other neighbourhoods. It seems to me that all we care about are the numbers, and not causes of the problems in the first place. I am learning new mind blowing concepts every day in class, I am reading more and more cases where through education communities, individuals and countries have changed their future. So why are the government and authorities are still trying to impose on how we should live our lives? Isn’t that common sense? Tilbury and Cooke (2005) say, “learning for sustainability does not rely on experts to determine how people should behave or how they should think, rather it promotes the learner’s active engagement in decision making and developing policy”, so as per the Kings Cross case, to learn how to not just fix the problems after the damage is done, we should take ownership of our decisions, commitment to the action chosen and be aware of the impact that we create.
Parts of the process of the learning
or education for sustainable development are future thinking and envisioning.
They are both pivotal components of sustainability and act as a transformation
tool where individuals change the way they relate with their future through the
way they act today. The individual process of “envisioning” a better future is
the same as an organization trying to define its vision and mission. It is, in
a way, where and how people want to live in 10 or 20 years, it is what a
organization wants to achieve in short medium and long term. It is about a
process of engaging people to share their aspirations and dreams and possibly
make them come through. Future thinking is a tool to get people actively
involved in imaging a sustainable future, “People need a direction, they need a
vision they can aim for” (Amanda Keogh, 2005).
To exemplify, at the workshop, our
facilitator asked us to close our eyes and imagine a world where we would like
to leave in the next 5 or 10 years, then we had to draw a scenario of exactly
what we thought and outline five key values that we based our vision on. That exercise is used
to empower and motivate people to change. It makes people start to understand what
values underpin their vision for a better future. This process is also a great
way to uncover the real values that drive our lives such as adaptive,
resilience, flexible, respect, tolerance, unity, equity or justice to name a
few. It was fascinating to see how many different kinds and perceptions of future
people had. Some looked at the integration and relation between individuals
around the world, others looked at how the use of renewable energy could change
our future and even others looked at how we could introduce more green to our
busy cities. I guess that is the first step where you start to share your ideas
and dreams with others and you really get to start to think that some people
out there have similar, or the same visions and perceptions and values as you, and you
both share the same dreams that motivate you towards taking action on those
dreams. We all know that if a company
does not have a clear vision of where it’s going, what it wants to achieve and
who they are, their business is doomed before it has even started. So how can we
work towards a more sustainable world if we don’t even know what kind of world
we want? To make things easier I drew my dream world (I know it doesn’t look that great LOL).
My vision was based on a “new world”
where everyone would have to get in through a door of a new beginning for a
better future. This new world would be full of new ideas integrating rural
areas, metropolitan areas our homes and how we generate our energy. Maybe I was
trying to express this feeling of “we are all part of one ecosystem”, so my key
words were integration, participation, sustainable, renewable and equity. I
found out two things after doing this exercise, first I am a terrible drawer, and second, I had this invisible barrier about the way in which I see the world. In undertaking that exercise of sharing experience and expectations I was able to better communicate with myself and find a common goal similar to that of my colleagues.
Reading through the literature, I found many other ways to facilitate an envisioning process such as:
· Future
trees, which allow people to consider in depth possible future impacts of a
particular change;
·
Timelines,
where people construct individuals or communities timeline of important past
events up to the present.
·
Change
Cards;
·
Future
wheels; (Tilbury and Wortman 2004)
Future
= Imagination it
is a process of:
Vision Choice Plan Action
"Vision" process creates something
concrete/desirable,
"Choice" is an alternative of sticking unsustainable practices or moving towards sustainable practices.
"Plan" is the measurement tool, setting goals, achievement, targets of short and long term.
"Action" is your attitudes based on the values that you clarified and discovered about yourself while envisioning what would be a more sustainable world. Actions can be on a personal or group level.
"Choice" is an alternative of sticking unsustainable practices or moving towards sustainable practices.
"Plan" is the measurement tool, setting goals, achievement, targets of short and long term.
"Action" is your attitudes based on the values that you clarified and discovered about yourself while envisioning what would be a more sustainable world. Actions can be on a personal or group level.
So this process of future thinking
and Envisioning offer us the opportunity of take ownership of our own visions
towards change. It creates an atmosphere of sharing and participation. It
clarifies what is really important to us and what and why we value certain things. And finally last but not
least it starts to create a sense of critical thinking challenging us to
question what we really want for our future.
I Just thought I would share with you guys this image because it really caught my attention on the same day of the workshop about visioning. That is an Ad from Warringah council trying to urge the community awareness to create a holistic view of a new strategic plan and vision of the council. Thanks